Skip to content

PART 3 OF 3 · THE RADAR LOGBOOK SERIES

How buyers, inspectors and lenders read your logbooks.

Two identical jets can sell, finance and insure very differently. The difference is in the binders. Here is who reads them, the five questions they ask, and what good answers look like, on the real records of Challenger 350 N395PD.

0:00 / 2:04
Two jets

Sound on for the soundtrack; captions are on by default. Keys: Space plays and pauses, arrows skip 5 seconds, 1 to 8 jump to a chapter. Download the MP4.

WHO READS THEM

Four readers, one set of binders.

Each one reads for a different reason. Records can move the price, the financing and the insurance significantly, because each of these readers prices what the records cannot show.

1

The pre-buy inspector

Works for the buyer. Reads the records against the aircraft: data plates, inspection status, ADs, damage and repairs. Findings go into a report the deal is negotiated from.

2

The buyer’s broker

Turns what the inspector finds into price and terms. A gap or a missing tag becomes a holdback, a fix the seller pays for, or a lower offer.

3

The lender and the insurer

Rely on the records to support the aircraft’s value and condition before they finance or cover it. Weak records can mean more conditions, more questions, or a lower valuation.

4

The FAA, for Part 135

When an aircraft is added to a Part 135 operator’s certificate, FAA inspectors review its records as part of the conformity inspection. The operator’s maintenance program has to pick the aircraft up from where its records say it is.

THE FIVE QUESTIONS

A records scorecard.

Every records review comes back to five questions. Here they are with a real answer from N395PD for each.

ScorecardThe questionOn N395PD
CompleteAre all the books here, with no gaps in time?2,906.1 to 3,015.4 hrs, Jan to Feb 2026, in order
TraceableDoes every serialized part have its tag and its history?Shaft S/N 12-162684-00105: 8130-3 with 4,648.98 hrs, 2,563 cycles
AD currentIs every AD on the list, with method and next due?AD 74-08-09 R3 (k): next due by 4,015.4 hrs
Damage documentedIs every major repair, alteration and damage event on paper?Form 337 and approved data for each, STC paperwork on file
ConsistentDo the times agree across books?Airframe and engine 1: 3,015.4 hrs on 10 Feb 2026
The scorecard from the film. Values from N395PD’s records; the damage row is the general standard, since this page shows no damage records for N395PD.

1 · COMPLETE

Every book, and no gaps in time.

The first thing a reviewer does is count the books. Airframe logs from new, each engine’s logs, the APU and propeller logs if fitted, and the supporting work order packages. A missing volume is the first question.

Then they read the entries in order. Each one picks up where the last ended, and total time and landings only go forward. Five of N395PD’s airframe entries from early 2026 read like this:

13 Jan 2026: 2,906.1 hours, 2,125 landings. Service check; nose wheels retorqued.
27 Jan 2026: 2,973.3 hours, 2,155 landings. Main gear struts serviced.
29 Jan 2026: 2,980.8 hours, 2,158 landings. Wheels and tires inspected.
3 Feb 2026: 2,994.0 hours, 2,165 landings. Fire extinguishers inspected; ECU downloads.
10 Feb 2026: 3,015.4 hours, 2,174 landings. 600 hour tasks.

WHAT A GAP LOOKS LIKE

Hours with no record are a question for the seller.

An example, not N395PD: an entry at 1,204.6 hours on 12 Mar, and the next at 1,391.2 hours on 30 Sep. That is 186.6 hours and 6 months with no maintenance recorded. The aircraft may have flown cleanly the whole time, but the records cannot show it, so the buyer’s side asks: where was it, who maintained it, and were inspections done on time?

The usual fixes are finding the missing pages (from the operator, the shop or the previous owner), reconstructing the period from flight logs and shop records, or accepting the gap and pricing it in.

2 · TRACEABLE

Every serialized part, back to birth.

Every serialized part installed should have a release document, and every life-limited part a history back to new. On work order 39023 (14 Jul 2026), N395PD’s left engine received two parts:

Shaft, stub, LPT, P/N 3035691-1, S/N 12-162684-00105: an 8130-3 from Honeywell’s repair station, overhauled, 10 Mar 2026, block 14a. Block 12 carries its history: 4,648.98 hours and 2,563 cycles, run on another engine before overhaul.
Seal, carbon, No. 4 bearing, P/N 70041289-2, S/N 26-169020-00568: an 8130-3 from Honeywell as a new part, 8 May 2026, block 13a. For a new part, that tag is where its history starts.

3 · AD STATUS

Every applicable AD, how it was met, and when it is next due.

14 CFR 91.417(a)(2)(v) requires the current status of every applicable AD: the AD number and revision, the method of compliance and, for recurring ADs, the time and date the next action is due. A reviewer checks the list against the FAA’s ADs for the airframe, engines, APU and installed appliances, then checks the entries behind each line.

AD 74-08-09 R3 paragraph (k) (lavatory waste receptacle doors): complied with on 10 Feb 2026 at 3,015.4 hrs. It repeats at 1,000 hours or less, so it is next due by 4,015.4 hrs. On 14 Jul 2026 the airframe had 3,446.5 hours.
AD 2024-18-03 paragraph (g) (left DCPC unit): the paragraph requires a records check unless the unit was cleaned per Safran SB 975GC02Y-24-018. The January 2025 airframe entry records the left DCPC, P/N 975GC02Y07, per that bulletin. The paragraph has no repeat interval.

4 · DAMAGE AND MAJOR REPAIRS

Major work leaves its own paper.

A major repair or major alteration is recorded on FAA Form 337, with the approved data used, under 14 CFR 43.9(d) and Part 43 Appendix B. The logbook entry records the work and points to the form. 91.417(a)(2)(vi) keeps copies of the 337s for major alterations with the aircraft for good.

An STC modification is usually a major alteration, so it has a 337 that names the STC. Keep the STC itself, its installation data and its instructions for continued airworthiness with the records, and make sure the maintenance program picks those instructions up.

Buyers ask about damage history directly. The answer they want is a list of every event, each with its repair records: what was damaged, the data used for the repair, who did it, and the return to service. A repair that is visible on the aircraft and missing from the records is one of the hardest questions to answer late in a deal.

5 · CONSISTENT

The books agree with each other.

Times recorded in different books on the same day should agree. On 10 Feb 2026, N395PD’s 600 hour package shows the airframe at 3,015.4 hours and 2,174 landings, and engine 1 (S/N P136235) at 3,015.4 hours and 2,186 cycles. On 14 Jul 2026 the engine entry for work order 39023 shows 3,446.5 hours on both, with 2,393 landings and 2,405 engine cycles. Engine cycles sit 12 above landings on both dates: a steady relationship a reviewer can follow.

An example, not N395PD: the airframe book reads 1,512.3 hours and the engine book 1,521.3 on the same day. Two digits are swapped, and until someone finds which book is right, every time-based limit on that engine is in doubt.

GLOSSARY

The words a records review uses.

Total time (TT, TAT)
Hours in service of the airframe since new. Each engine, propeller and APU keeps its own total too. 14 CFR 91.417(a)(2)(i) requires them in the records.
Landings and cycles
The airframe counts landings. Engines count cycles, which need not match landings exactly; what matters is that each count only goes forward and the relationship stays steady.
Life-limited part
A part with a mandatory replacement limit in hours, cycles or calendar time, set by the type certificate or the Airworthiness Limitations section of the manufacturer’s instructions (14 CFR 91.403(c)).
Back to birth
A history that follows a part from the day it was made to today, through every installation, overhaul and shop visit. It is how a life-limited part proves how much life it has left.
FAA Form 8130-3
The Authorized Release Certificate that travels with a part: a maker’s release of a new part, or a repair station’s release after its work. It releases the part, not the aircraft.
Method of compliance
How an AD was met: the inspection, modification, part replacement or service bulletin the AD allows. 91.417(a)(2)(v) requires it in the AD status, with the next due time for recurring ADs.
FAA Form 337
The Major Repair and Alteration form. A major repair or alteration is recorded on it, with the approved data used, under 14 CFR 43.9(d) and Part 43 Appendix B.
STC
A supplemental type certificate: FAA approval for a design change to a type-certificated product. Installing one is usually a major alteration, recorded on a 337 that names the STC.
Conformity inspection
For a Part 135 operator, the FAA’s check that an aircraft and its records conform before it is added to the operator’s certificate.

ABOUT THIS EXAMPLE

Real values in the film and on this page come from one airframe, Challenger 350 serial 20577, registered N395PD (records before April 2026 name its earlier registration, N575MW): five airframe entries from January and February 2026, the 600 hour package of 10 February 2026, work order 39023 and its 8130-3 tags (14 Jul 2026), and the airframe entry of January 2025. The two jets, the gap in time and the mismatched totals are hypothetical examples and are labeled that way. The Form 337 is a blank form redrawn for illustration. Names, signatures, certificate numbers and shops are left out or redacted. The photographs of the hangar, parts and paperwork are illustrations, not this aircraft.

THE SERIES

SOURCES