SIDE BY SIDE

Radar vs Veryon

Veryon is a capable maintenance tracker, and Radar imports from it. The difference is what sits underneath: a tracker holds a copy of your aircraft; Radar holds the record itself.

THE MODEL DIFFERENCE

A tracker holds a copy. Radar holds the record.

Veryon Tracking (the Flightdocs heritage) centralizes due lists, discrepancies, work orders, and reporting with strong mobile apps. It still follows the standalone-tracker model: the tracker holds entries that were keyed in; the logbooks live somewhere else.

On Radar, your due items come from your maintenance program and completions are read from the digitized logbook. Reconciliation is automatic, and every figure cites the page it came from.

The Radar record dashboard: engine assemblies with live hours and cycles above the service log
The record and the tracking, one product.
Radar Veryon
Due lists & maintenance forecasting
Downtime & budget forecasting
Completions reconciled against the digitized logbook
Digital logbook & full records archive included
Every figure cited to its source page
No re-keying: entries extracted from the record
Insurance placement off the same record
Aircraft & portfolio valuation
Imports from Veryonn/a
What you payIncluded with the Radar recordSeparate per-aircraft subscription

Competitor rows summarize how traditional maintenance trackers work as standalone subscriptions. Capabilities and pricing change; confirm current details with Veryon Tracking.

ALREADY ON VERYON?

Keep it as long as you like. Radar reconciles it.

Radar imports your Veryon data on day one, then checks the tracker against the digitized record and flags every place they disagree. Run both in parallel. Nothing forces a cutover date.

Start the import →
A scanned logbook page beside the structured record Radar extracted from it
The import in action: one PDF, 247 events extracted.

See both models on your own aircraft.

A 30-minute walkthrough. Bring your current Veryon due list and compare.